×
Skip to main content

Thursday, 26 December 2024 | 09:55 am

|   Subscribe   |   donation   Support Us    |   donation

Log in
Register


"Waqf Act is against secularism, unity, and integrity of the nation; Waqf is not mentioned anywhere in the Constitution" says Ashwini Upadhyay: Filed PIL in Delhi HC challenging provisions of Waqf Act

The PIL also seeks direction that the dispute relating to religious properties shall be decided by the Civil Court only
 |  Satyaagrah  |  Opinion
Advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay has filed PIL in the Delhi High Court challenging the Waqf Act 1995
Advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay has filed PIL in the Delhi High Court challenging the Waqf Act 1995

Advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay has filed public interest litigation (PIL) in the Delhi High Court challenging the Waqf Act 1995. The PIL states that the Act is made under the garb of managing waqf properties but there are no similar laws for followers of other religions. The PIL challenges the validity of various provisions under this act.

Upadhyay pleaded that the Act is against secularism, unity, and integrity of the nation. He also highlighted that the Waqf is not mentioned anywhere in the Constitution. 

In his plea, Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay said, “If the impugned Act has been made to protect the rights guaranteed under Articles 29-30 then it has to cover all the minorities i.e., followers of Jainism, Buddhism, Sikhism, Judaism, Bahaism, Zoroastrianism, Christianity, and not only Islam.”

Upadhyay pleaded that the Waqf Act is against secularism, unity, and integrity of the nation
Upadhyay pleaded that the Waqf Act is against secularism, unity, and integrity of the nation

The PIL mentions, “Centre cannot make Tribunals arbitrarily beyond the scope of Articles 323A–323B, but if the impugned Act is enacted under Article 245 and Entry-97 of the List-1 of the Schedule-7, then the Tribunal has to perform in consonance with Articles 14-15.”

Advocate Upadhyay’s plea further states, “The Religious Endowment Act 1863, Indian Trustees Act 1866, Indian Trust Act 1882, Charitable Endowment Act 1890, Official Trustees Act 1913, and Charitable and Religious Act 1990 are made to manage trusts and religious endowments of all communities. But rather than unifying them and making a ‘Uniform Code for Trust and Trustees, Charities and Charitable Institutions, Charitable and Religious Endowments and Religious Institution’, Centre has arbitrarily enacted the impugned religion-biased Act against the basic tenets of Articles 14-15.”

The dispute relating to the Waqf properties is decided by the Waqf Tribunal as per the Waqf Act. The PIL also challenges this provision and seeks direction that the dispute relating to religious properties shall be decided by the Civil Court only under Section 9 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908.

The dispute relating to the Waqf properties are decided by the Waqf Tribunal as per the Waqf Act
The dispute relating to the Waqf properties are decided by the Waqf Tribunal as per the Waqf Act

Earlier, the Supreme Court had refused to hear the plea seeking directions to the central government or the law commission of India to draft a ‘Uniform Code for Trust-Trustees and Charities-Charitable Institutions’ in the spirit of Articles 14 &15 of the Constitution. The Supreme Court’s bench said that it cannot direct the parliament to enact such a law.

References:

opindia.com

Support Us


Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.

While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.

Pay Satyaagrah

Please share the article on other platforms

To Top

DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.


Related Articles